Posted by: admin in
Mitsubishi on August 8th, 2010
In today’s polluted world, it is become very important walk around with the protecting shield to save as from all kinds of harmful rays. As we cannot Tinted windows serve a very important function in protecting you and your car from the harmful rays of sun. The film used for sun control films is polyester with a scratch resistant coating on one side and a clear mounting adhesive on the other. Some tips to be followed before the installing the film.
The concept of window films on flat glass was introduced way back in 1960 and made a huge market from then with wide range of colors and shades. Before selecting the window tint for car, it is always better to research the legal laws related to it. Some countries have outlawed window tinting through out. The darkness of the tinting is also legislated. This is measured by Visible Light Transmission (VLT %), defined as percentage of light visible through tint. So a professional should be familiar with the laws and provide you the certificate of the compliance, incase you are questioned by the authorities.
Though you can tint your car windows yourself, it is always better to have a professional help. It not only looks neat and better but also lasts longer and is guaranteed also makes sure that the job is legal and provides warrantee if any thing goes wrong.
Tinting takes place through following basic process. First and foremost the window(s) must be cleaned properly and prepped to the take the film. As all the window(s) comes in different shapes and sizes, proper measurement is to b taken and then the film is precisely cut to fit. Finally the film is adhered to the window with mounting solution. It should be a clear window, free of bubbles or any folds. Once the procedure is done, you should ensure that the window is not opened and it should be kept dry for two days. Tinted windows can be cleaned after 30 days to ensure proper bonding.
A tinted window helps you from harmful rays. They block 65% of sun’s rays and 99.9% of damaging UV rays and protect your eyes and skin from damage. It is also safe for your car. It protects from damaging your car upholstery and also makes your window pane safer by holding shattered glass in place.
If all of our neighbors would just drive even less, we’d get lower auto insurance rates.
And that could be in the process of happening. When Americans spend less time on the road, the frequency of auto accidents declines. And when auto accidents go down, so do claims on auto insurance. That gets the ball rolling: When auto insurance companies see their costs on claims declining steadily, they typically respond to market conditions by lowering their auto insurance quotes and, ultimately auto insurance rates in a bid to stay competitive. And voila!, we write smaller checks for our auto insurance premiums.
With run-away gas prices, Americans are already driving less. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) reported in May 2008 that Americans are driving at “historic lows.” The estimated “vehicle miles traveled,” or VMT, for March 2008 fell 4.3 percent compared to March 2007, making it the sharpest dip for any month since the FHWA began tracking traffic-volume trends in 1942. Want to follow driving trends? The FHWA publishes monthly “Traffic Volume Trends.”
When auto accident claims go down, auto insurance companies can usually respond fairly quickly. To adjust premiums, they must file new auto insurance rates with every state in which they operate. They can file new auto insurance rates any time they want to respond to market conditions, and many states offer a “file and use” system, where auto insurance companies can file new auto insurance rates and begin using them immediately without prior approval from the state insurance department. Some states even have a “use and file” system, so insurers can implement new auto insurance rates and then officially file them shortly thereafter. This way auto insurance companies can begin passing on savings (or increases) right away.
The nation’s largest auto insurance companies are the first to see trends in accidents and claims payments due to the sheer volume of their claims data. For example, State Farm, the nation’s largest auto insurance company, handles about 19 million auto insurance claims a year (that’s a little over 17 claims per minute, all day, every day).
Robert Passmore, Director of Personal Lines for Property Casualty Insurers Association of America (PCIAA), an industry trade group, says, “This is where you see competition kick in.” He notes that if you live in a state that requires “prior approval,” it would take a longer time to see rate reductions. That means Californians and New Yorkers could be tapping their toes waiting for auto insurance rate reductions while everyone else pockets savings.
Auto insurance companies also note that auto insurance rates have been holding steady or declining over the past few years anyway. For example, State Farm customers in all states have seen rate reductions between Jan. 1, 2004, and Dec. 31, 2007, and customers in 39 of those states saw double-digit percentage rate decreases. (State Farm policyholders in New Jersey got the biggest drop of 29.19 percent.)
Passmore cautions that other factors could offset the trend in reduced driving specifically, medical costs from bodily injury claims, legal costs relating to claims disputes and repair costs that are, for now, rising faster than the rate at which auto accident claims are going down.
Darn those repair, medical and legal costs! If it weren’t for those, drivers could already be seeing lower auto insurance rates (as we sit at home). However, auto insurance companies generally agree that if we see significant auto accident reductions, lower auto insurance rates won’t be too far behind.
Perhaps at the $6-a-gallon mark?
Will reduced driving mean lower auto insurance rates?
Insure.com asked the nation’s top auto insurance companies whether high gas prices and reduced driving are translating to lower auto insurance rates yet. Here are their answers.
State Farm spokesperson Dick Luedke notes that State Farm auto insurance rates have been on the decline nationwide since 2004, but reduced auto accident claims are not yet leading directly to further auto insurance rate reductions: “Our actuaries look at claims data not just to see the recent past, but also to see what might change the future, like gas prices.”
Luedke says there’s no hard and fast rule as to what level of auto accident reduction would spark lower auto insurance rates, but says, “If we saw a reduction as big as 10 percent in accident frequency, we would have reacted long before that.”
Allstate spokesperson Kate Hollcraft says, “We have just recently seen a decline in automobile claim frequency and if this continues through the summer months, we would probably be able to attribute it to a rise in fuel costs.”
Progressive spokesperson Leah Knapp says, “We don’t speculate about future rate changes, but it would be accurate to say that we continuously review market and business conditions, including monitoring losses, so that we can ensure our policies are accurately priced everywhere we do business. When our analysis suggests our rates require adjustment, we may seek to either raise or lower rates accordingly.”
Nationwide Vice President & Policyholder, Standard Auto Product & Pricing, Larry Thursby, observes that “customers are having fewer accidents.” But he notes it’s been that way for a couple of years due to a variety of factors, like an aging population that becomes safer drivers, graduated licensing laws for teens and crackdowns in drunk driving. In addition, potential auto insurance rate reductions due to accident frequency are being offset by inflation in the usual suspects: medical and hospital costs, repair costs and legal costs.
Thursby says that Nationwide has been passing along cost savings by offering guaranteed renewability, lower surcharges and broader “forgiveness” for accidents, fender-benders and minor violations.
Posted by: admin in
Auto tech on August 5th, 2010
General Motors is the lead target of the United Auto Worker union for their potential strike target in the contract conciliation with the Detroit Three, said two local officials of the group last Thursday.
Requesting for anonymous identity because the negotiations are considered confidential, the two UAW officials said that their local members have already received a notice last Thursday afternoon saying that GM in fact will be the lead.
Expiration of UAW contract with GM, Chrysler LLC, Ford Motor Co, is due on Friday midnight.
In regular conditions, the union talks with the lead company, in behalf of the other two. According to auto industry analysts, GM has the healthiest financial condition among the three.
Ford and Chrysler spokespersons said last Thursday that their companies have compromised for indefinite extensions with the UAW. The extensions can be canceled with three days prior notice.
“We’re going to continue to work together,” said Marcey Evans, spokeswoman for Ford.
Bargaining had formally begun last July and had been going since then, even before but not on formal conditions. Until Thursday, the talks are said to be successful but according to some union members at GM plants (where auto floor mats are made), they are told to prepare in case the need for a strike arises.
Halls to be strike headquarters are under preparation like one in a Cadillac assembly. Workers had also been preparing picket lines, according to the union president of UAW local 652 Chris Sherwood.
Sherwood had been thoroughly updated on how the negotiations had been doing by one of the members of the bargaining committee he is continuously in touch with. According to his source, the compromise had some bad turn last Wednesday night.
“Apparently from last night until this morning, everything’s changed,” Sherwood said. “I’ve never been asked to get my hall ready for a strike in the last four contracts.”
Comments from top persons involved like GM spokesman Tom Wickham and UAW international spokesman Roger Kerson have not been given.
For Harley Shaiken, an expert of Labor issues in the University of California in Berkeley, it’s hard to tell if the strike preparation is a drama or not.
“There’s a fine line between theater and substance in negotiations,” Shaiken said.
“Given the stakes, given the complexity, given the tension, you’ve got a temporary derailment. It’s unclear whether it’s more serious than that.”
For David Cole, the chairman of Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, either side cannot manage a strike.
“I would expect some tension down near the end. At some point in any of these negotiations you get to a point where there’s some tough talk. It just normally arrives a lot earlier than this,” he said.
There were no strikes that occurred during contract renewals in 1999 and 2003. In 1996, there were individual strikes at two GM plants but there had been no nationwide strikes during negotiations since 1976 because of the closing of some Ford plants.
In 2003, the union agreed to settle with the three companies and not choosing a strike target until now. In 1998, GM workers walked out for 54 days in two GM plants costing the company $2.2 billion.
The three Detroit-based auto makers had lost $15 billion combined last year making this year’s negotiation with the UAW a critical one. There had been sales losses due to high gasoline prices. The result, they have made thousands of their workers jobless in an effort to compete with Japanese automakers.